A/R turbine housing stock .63

[RatFink]

Could you all verify, I'm first owner and have looked at the turbine housing on my old stocker with my own eyeballs, but I found someone to dispute:

http://www.turbobuick.com/forums/turbos-turbo-related-parts/350129-gn-turbo-vs-tta-turbo.html

Why would you want to slow down with a .82 on a stock turbo or for any 231 ci stockish motor???

 

[TTA984]

Could you all verify, I'm first owner and have looked at the turbine housing on my old stocker with my own eyeballs, but I found someone to dispute:

http://www.turbobuick.com/forums/turbos-turbo-related-parts/350129-gn-turbo-vs-tta-turbo.html

Why would you want to slow down with a .82 on a stock turbo or for any 231 ci stockish motor???

You are right, stock is .63 on the housing for the TTA, my new TA49 has a garrett .63 housing also.

 

[Quiky One]

I backed ya up. Even though I look like an asshat

 

[RatFink]

You are right, stock is .63 on the housing for the TTA, my new TA49 has a garrett .63 housing also.

I would never recommend even using a .82 housing on a street car. I made the mistake back in 93' and tried a "cheetah". Terrible option, but little was known by local places as to what upgrades were available for a 89 Turbo trans Am back then. Anyway, terrible spool time, may have been good for a larger c.i. motor with more exhaust energy and higher stall convertor. But sucked on stock downpipe, stock motor.

 

[RatFink]

I backed ya up. Even though I look like an asshat

Ha, yeah, I saw you replied at the same time I did. Just want to not give the author of the thread any miss info. I mean, the experience of .82 housing will not let you forget the outcome very soon.....slowwwwww.